From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Jan 23 02:33:13 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id CAA13017
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 02:33:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asstdc.scgt.oz.au (root@asstdc.scgt.oz.au [202.14.234.65])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA12979;
          Thu, 23 Jan 1997 02:33:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from imb@localhost)
          by asstdc.scgt.oz.au (8.7.6/BSD4.4) id VAA08180
          Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:32:31 +1100 (EST)
From: michael butler <imb@scgt.oz.au>
Message-Id: <199701231032.VAA08180@asstdc.scgt.oz.au>
Subject: Re: Ip masquerade and sockd
In-Reply-To: <32E71839.4BA@ms2.hinet.net> from zerodist at "Jan 23, 97 03:50:17 pm"
To: zerodist@ms2.hinet.net
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 1997 21:32:30 +1100 (EST)
Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

zerodist writes:

> My LAN is using IPs from 192.168.x.x. Using sockd, netscape browser
> can browse Internet from any PC in the LAN. 
>  Is this the main functionality of IP masquerrade? If so, why not use
> sockd?

Functionality is not the only issue to be considered. Licensing terms and
conditions are also relevant,

	michael