From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 15:14:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCFD1106566B for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pcthegreat@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1458FC18 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk33 with SMTP id 33so31453900pzk.3 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:14:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Y/SxTBSxoxYh1z1zJX90zdrPRVT2a0LxIrIWC1h++DA=; b=t22l6SOC+fY2Ou9gKp8tqhtQctILyiwf0JBJQ7IBGqqPp36VimIQVK5X44/QYGysWQ C5U8gZJUtT6oR3OwENIyKSIiFgtruFpNigaV60q1vyzAW71cU7KgXLW7jrO6jucYksLe 8B2lJXp/462XuyzGwuwaMAIbvJozRHonUQ/jo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.209.9 with SMTP id mi9mr19332480pbc.62.1321370062552; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.44.65 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:14:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20111110123919.GF2164@hoeg.nl> <4EBC4B6E.4060607@FreeBSD.org> <20111111112821.GP2164@hoeg.nl> <4EBDC06F.6020907@FreeBSD.org> <20111112103918.GV2164@hoeg.nl> <4EBF0003.3060401@FreeBSD.org> <20111113091940.GX2164@hoeg.nl> <4EC04B65.4030801@FreeBSD.org> <20111114092922.GA2164@hoeg.nl> <20111114172609.1c2aeb0a@davenulle.org> <4ec21d02.DIq3JznJ4WBtwCd7%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:14:22 +0400 Message-ID: From: selven To: selven Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: ed@80386.nl, patfbsd@davenulle.org, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The strangeness called `sbin' X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:14:23 -0000 My excuse for the poor english : 'inebriated' It does makes sense, but over the years people have gotten used to it, wrote scripts that assumed certain things to be in /sbin while some to be at /bin .. wouldn't the mere action of discussing about whether we should do it some other way when the gain is not that great, be called as bike shedding? On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:06 PM, selven wrote: > It does makes sense, but over the years people have gotten used to it, > wrote scripts that assumed certain things to be in /sbin while some to be > at /bin .. wouldn't the mere action of discussing about whether we should > do it some other way when it the gain is not the great be called as bike > shedding? > > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:04 PM, wrote: > >> Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: >> >> > I would like to keep /usr/local for ports only. >> > When things are going wrong with ports it is sometimes >> > easier to rm -rf /usr/local and rebuild all from scratch. >> >> When using this approach -- which I agree makes sense -- >> where should one put truly local (non-ports) executables >> (/usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin being reserved for >> ports executables)? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > *Pirabarlen Cheenaramen *| $3|v3n* * > /*memory is like prison*/ > (user==selven)?free(user):user=malloc(sizeof(brain)); > P Save electricity & disk space. Cat this mail to >/dev/null 2>&1 after > use. > > -- *Pirabarlen Cheenaramen *| $3|v3n* * L'escalier mobile: +230 49 24 918 email: pcthegeat@gmail.com || god@hackers.mu contact: http://godifiy.me /*memory is like prison*/ (user==selven)?free(user):user=malloc(sizeof(brain)); P Save electricity & disk space. Cat this mail to >/dev/null 2>&1 after use.