Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 11:20:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, William Grzybowski <wg@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r321141 - head/devel/glog Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307191118260.3414@trevally.site> In-Reply-To: <20130718135432.GA37227@FreeBSD.org> References: <201306171644.r5HGiqSr058369@svn.freebsd.org> <20130618033635.GC57172@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1306181849380.1789@trevally.site> <20130718135432.GA37227@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Interesting; please tell us the summary at the end of the discussions as > I'm always interested in USE_GCC logic. Ideally, it should allow to select > from 1) system GCC (4.2) on Clang-default versions of FreeBSD, and 2) nice, > stable, non-volatile, LTS, whatever, GCC version that does not have to be > rebuilt every few weeks, when system compiler (either GCC 4.2 or Clang) is > not sufficient. If you want to go for a stable (and reasonable, unlike GCC 4.2 -- regardless of lang/gcc42 or the old system compiler) version of GCC then lang/gcc is the answer. USE_GCC=yes requests that and should be preferred over any specific version numbers where possible. Gerald
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.LNX.2.00.1307191118260.3414>