From owner-freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org Tue Jul 25 15:37:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkg@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDE6C7EFC0 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:37:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell1.rawbw.com (shell1.rawbw.com [198.144.192.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884D67FFC5; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:37:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from yv.noip.me (c-24-6-186-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.186.56]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell1.rawbw.com (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPSA id v6PFbXPe028494 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:37:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell1.rawbw.com: Host c-24-6-186-56.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.6.186.56] claimed to be yv.noip.me Subject: Re: [feature idea] Allow duplicate files with the same content To: Nikolai Lifanov , freebsd-pkg@FreeBSD.org Cc: Kubilay Kocak References: <96dbc99f-3a21-423d-18b8-6737c5517ff8@rawbw.com> <4e47eea6-a054-30da-bab1-18b4e82270fb@FreeBSD.org> From: Yuri Message-ID: Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 08:37:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4e47eea6-a054-30da-bab1-18b4e82270fb@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkg@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Binary package management and package tools discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 15:37:39 -0000 On 07/25/2017 06:24, Nikolai Lifanov wrote: > On 7/24/17 6:12 PM, Yuri wrote: >> Currently several py-backports-* ports install the same __init__.py file >> into the same location. This is the only conflict between several ports. >> This was by design, because they didn't think it matters to overwrite >> the same file installed by another package. [1] >> > The content of these is the same functionally but not textually. > The comments, spacing, single line versus three lines, etc. is > different. It's the same python code, but it won't hash to the same thing. > > - Nikolai > Just patch it to be the same if the functionality is the same. Yuri