From owner-freebsd-chat Sat Mar 1 19:37:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id TAA18142 for chat-outgoing; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:37:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [204.188.121.18]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA18137 for ; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:37:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA00350; Sat, 1 Mar 1997 19:35:29 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703020335.TAA00350@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Brian Tao cc: "John S. Dyson" , FREEBSD-CHAT-L Subject: Re: RSA 56-bit key challenge In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 01 Mar 1997 22:29:25 EST." Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 19:35:29 -0800 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-chat@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Yeap, If the PC has fast EDO or SDRAM it should be possible. I am pretty sure that the processor is starving for memory bandwith. Now a quad PPro equip with fast SDRAM will be something wild to watch 8) Again, anyone out there with a fast PPRO with fast EDO (60 ns or better)... ?? Cheers, Amancio >From The Desk Of Brian Tao : > On Sat, 1 Mar 1997, Amancio Hasty wrote: > > > > I too will be running my client at nights . Right now I am tweaking my box 8) > > rc5-56-client: Performance testing with 1000000 crypts > > rc5-56-client: Complete in 2.838 seconds. (352389.25 keys/sec) > > Hmmmm... think it would be possible to squeeze 400000 keys/sec out > of an Intel CPU? :) > -- > Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org) > "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't" >