From owner-freebsd-security Sun May 16 21:54:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.enteract.com (thor.enteract.com [207.229.143.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B004F151F5 for ; Sun, 16 May 1999 21:54:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) Received: (qmail 28226 invoked from network); 17 May 1999 04:54:25 -0000 Received: from shell-2.enteract.com (dscheidt@207.229.143.41) by thor.enteract.com with SMTP; 17 May 1999 04:54:25 -0000 Received: from localhost (dscheidt@localhost) by shell-2.enteract.com (8.9.3/8.9.2) with SMTP id XAA42878; Sun, 16 May 1999 23:54:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dscheidt@enteract.com) X-Authentication-Warning: shell-2.enteract.com: dscheidt owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 23:54:25 -0500 (CDT) From: David Scheidt To: "Isaac D. Kishk" Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: secure backup In-Reply-To: <19990516234827.A2021@io.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 16 May 1999, Isaac D. Kishk wrote: :Small fundamental question... how would you trust the tape if the machine :the tape is attached to is untrusted? : I can see situations where you can trust that the tape will be made properly, but can't trust that someone won't have a look at the data while it crosses the wire, is on the tapehost, or on the tape. A remote datacenter is one likely possibility. David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message