From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 15:19:52 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 9229C968; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:19:52 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mathieu Arnold Subject: Re: svn commit: r374466 - head/Mk Message-ID: <20141210151952.GA16023@FreeBSD.org> References: <201412101510.sBAFAeLg034594@svn.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201412101510.sBAFAeLg034594@svn.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:19:52 -0000 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:10:40PM +0000, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > New Revision: 374466 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/374466 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r374466/ > > Log: > Patches go into PATCHDIR, not FILESDIR. > > Pointy hat to: Everybody that looked at the code review, me included. Not really; I recall there was an idea to get rid of PATCHDIR altogether, it's more of a relic these days. FILESDIR works equally well and makes more sense (i.e. there is "files" directory and no "patches"). ./danfe