Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:32:20 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?q?Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Subject: Re: Systems running hot? Message-ID: <200912221032.21674.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <863a34qxtw.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <4B2D4B53.1060503@FreeBSD.org> <20091221123912.GB3253@current.Sisis.de> <863a34qxtw.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > the actual 68,5C is with KDE up, but nearly idle system; what does > > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 107,0C mean? > > These are motherboard temperatures, not CPU temperatures. Really? I would expect tz0 to be CPU temperature (via ACPI but still probably using the same diode as coretemp would read). That said I don't recall any system I have ever run FreeBSD one having more than tz0 :) FWIW the Core 2 Duo in my "games" machine which is overclocked from 2.13 to 3.06GHz idles at 60C and gets up to 75C when under heavy use. Before overclocking it used to idle around 50C (that appeared to be the BIOS's target temperature) 68.5C for a standard C2D on a nominally idle system seems very high. -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBLMAyN5ZPcIHs/zowRAg8sAJ4kC3JCOIrWYflq1+AXpDA39N2O6ACgrBtg 6iEB/QhGnxdrEy/HJjmLoiI= =TWRK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200912221032.21674.doconnor>