From owner-freebsd-arch  Fri Nov 17 14:46:12 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from gratis.grondar.za (grouter.grondar.za [196.7.18.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 44C7937B479; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 14:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from grondar.za (grapevine.grondar.za [196.7.18.17])
	by gratis.grondar.za (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eAHMfNJ07835;
	Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:41:23 +0200 (SAST)
	(envelope-from mark@grondar.za)
Message-Id: <200011172241.eAHMfNJ07835@gratis.grondar.za>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	John Hay <jhay@icomtek.csir.co.za>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: new monotime() call for all architectures. 
References: <26014.974490789@critter> 
In-Reply-To: <26014.974490789@critter> ; from Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>  "Fri, 17 Nov 2000 20:53:09 +0100."
Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:41:25 +0200
From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> If it isn't dealing properly with async PCC/TSC counters on SMP machines
> it shouldn't be called "monoanyting".
> 
> I guess I totally object to the name now :-)

I need the access. What name will please you?

M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message