From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 1 13:16:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96AB916A4CE; Sat, 1 May 2004 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bigass1.bitblock.com (ns1.bitblock.com [66.199.170.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49AE943D62; Sat, 1 May 2004 13:16:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mitch@bitblock.com) Received: from a1200 ([24.83.187.201]) (AUTH: LOGIN mitch@bitblock.com) by bigass1.bitblock.com with esmtp; Sat, 01 May 2004 20:15:59 +0000 X-Abuse-Reports: Visit http://www.bitblock.com/abuse.php X-Abuse-Reports: and submit a copy of the message headers X-Abuse-Reports: or review our policies and procedures X-Abuse-Reports: ID= 4094057F.00006381.bigass1.bitblock.com,dns; a1200 ([24.83.187.201]),AUTH: LOGIN mitch@bitblock.com From: "Mitch (bitblock)" To: "Robert Blacquiere" Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 13:15:59 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 In-Reply-To: <20040501091220.GT67426@bombur.guldan.demon.nl> cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Routing and VPN troubles... X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 20:16:04 -0000 > May be it is possible to use proxy arp on de "gateway" FBSD4 > machine. So all > machines can talk to each thru FBSD4 box. We use some similair setup to > prevent people to talk to each without us knowning (bigboss is watching). > > All traffic will then be handled by the proxy arp box. > I'll look and see what info I can find on this idea - had a few people suggest I switch to OpenVPN instead of IPSec which creates virtual devices allowing full firewalling etc. Thanks Robert m/