Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 02:07:04 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Rus Foster <rghf@fsck.me.uk> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UNIONFS Stability Message-ID: <20030719090704.GA77381@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030718232702.Y2947@thor.65535.net> References: <20030718232702.Y2947@thor.65535.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:30:15PM -0700, Rus Foster wrote: > Hi All, > How stable is unionfs? Reading the man page for mount_unionfs its says > that its not. Is that still true or is it better on 5.x? ATM I'm running > 4.8 unionfs may work if you use it read-only and don't change files in the lower layer, but your mileage may vary (i.e. expect problems). There might be some work on improving stability in the future, but it's unlikely to be completely fixed soon. Kris --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/GQo4Wry0BWjoQKURAvEAAKCsXmvCWyEEtPqNQ8ciXBqXVCpMqwCgqprV oFBOXsrWsfjXTt0PD7XsK9g= =vGfq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030719090704.GA77381>