From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 16 19:33:57 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECA3B16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 May 2005 19:33:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652B943D6D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 16 May 2005 19:33:57 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j4GJXZqF024691;
	Mon, 16 May 2005 13:33:35 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 13:33:35 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20050516.133335.104054202.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: fli+freebsd-current@shapeshifter.se
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050516170230.GB90847@shapeshifter.se>
References: <20050516170230.GB90847@shapeshifter.se>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Patch to make powerd(8) devd(8)-aware
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 19:33:58 -0000

Cool!

> During the same time I also discovered a bug(?) in devd which causes it
> to terminate with a broken pipe if a client reading /var/run/devd.pipe 
> disappears. Blocking SIGPIPE fixes this.

Any reason that signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_IGN); wasn't used?

Warner