From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 30 21:10:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6C837B404 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785BA43F3F for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h2V5A4NS009039 for ; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:10:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h2V5A4UX009038; Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:10:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 21:10:04 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200303310510.h2V5A4UX009038@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Kimura Fuyuki Subject: Re: ports/50444: Suggestion for new category: "dns" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kimura Fuyuki List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 05:10:05 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/50444; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kimura Fuyuki To: edwin@mavetju.org Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/50444: Suggestion for new category: "dns" Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:07:05 +0900 At Mon, 31 Mar 2003 14:43:45 +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 02:46:12PM +0900, Kimura Fuyuki wrote: > > I believe that it is reasonable to introduce a new category "dns" > > which consists of all the ports relating to the Domain Name System, > > because: > > Maybe it's time to see if there could be subcategories, so that you > get net/dns, net/im, net/ping. The ports-system itself is modular > enough to get it that way without too much problems. I saw someone proposed the plan but rejected by one of the portmgr, if my memory is correct...