Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 02:45:42 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@atg.aciworldwide.com> Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20011026024542.B12708@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011025225351.jhb@FreeBSD.org>; from jhb@FreeBSD.org on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:53:51PM -0700 References: <20011025190116.C4609@dragon.nuxi.com> <XFMail.011025225351.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 10:53:51PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> Messy?
Yes, needless junk.
> Index: Makefile
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc/Makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.24
> diff -u -r1.24 Makefile
> --- Makefile 27 Mar 2001 14:58:37 -0000 1.24
> +++ Makefile 26 Oct 2001 05:46:19 -0000
> @@ -9,7 +9,10 @@
> SRCS= gcc.c gccspec.c
> NOSHARED?=yes
>
> -LINKS= ${BINDIR}/cc ${BINDIR}/gcc
> +LINKS= ${BINDIR}/cc
> +.ifdef(GCC_NAMES)
> +LINKS+= ${BINDIR}/gcc
> +.endif
uh...
+.if !defined(NO_GCC_LINK)
if anything.
Again, other than some utopian idea of a clensed spirit, what do you hope
to acomplish with this change?
> It seems more like you just don't like the idea since
> you wouldn't use it and thus have decided to take it as a personal
> issue. It's just hardlinks to a few binaries here, not the end of the
> world.
I will direct all the freebsd-questions email on "where did gcc" go to
you.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011026024542.B12708>