From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Dec 17 9: 6:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D12B37B420; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 09:06:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from mustang.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp0.lariat.org@lariat.org [12.23.109.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA28222; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:06:26 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20011217100320.02965920@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 10:06:20 -0700 To: Nils Holland , Terry Lambert From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: IBM's intentions with JFS (was: IBM suing (was: RMS Suing was [SUGGESTION] - JFS for FreeBSD)) Cc: Greg Lehey , "Gary W. Swearingen" , hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org, "Brandon D. Valentine" , Hiten Pandya , chat@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <20011217145322.A45210@tisys.org> References: <3C1DDB26.62969FFB@mindspring.com> <3C186381.6AB07090@yahoo.com> <20011214122837.O3448@monorchid.lemis.com> <3C19807D.C441F084@mindspring.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011214175450.02da2a90@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011215232233.00e74cc0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20011216221810.031b6820@localhost> <20011217163427.A2885@monorchid.lemis.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20011217001345.00e26280@localhost> <20011217111835.A43375@tisys.org> <3C1DDB26.62969FFB@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 06:53 AM 12/17/2001, Nils Holland wrote: >In the end, whatever gets done, I'd suggest that any unclear implications >of any futher move be investigated into beforehand, because else we could >face some very unpleasant problems in the end... I agree. Because there are many parties involved who could potentially be unreasonable (RMS and the FSF in particular, but also IBM), the only reasonable course of action is to avoid ANYTHING that is GPLed and stick to the one form of open source licensing that (a) has been tested in court; (b) is short, clear, and unambiguous; and (c) is consistent with the BSD Way. This means only "truly free" licensing, as embodied in the BSD and MIT X licenses and kin. Only by sticking to such licenses will we ever know where we truly stand. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message