From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:56:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D9316A4CE; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:56:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ylpvm43.prodigy.net (ylpvm43-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8561143D45; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 17:56:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from elischer.org (adsl-67-124-49-205.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [67.124.49.205])i91HurCE021701; Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:56:54 -0400 Message-ID: <415D9A5B.10200@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 10:56:43 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030524 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephan Uphoff References: <1095468747.31297.241.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096477932.3733.1471.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096489576.3733.1868.camel@palm.tree.com> <200409291652.29990.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <1096496057.3733.2163.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096603981.21577.195.camel@palm.tree.com> <1096608201.21577.203.camel@palm.tree.com> <20041001141040.GA1556@peter.osted.lan> <1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com> In-Reply-To: <1096647194.27811.12.camel@palm.tree.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Peter Holm cc: John Baldwin cc: "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: scheduler (sched_4bsd) questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 17:56:46 -0000 Stephan Uphoff wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 10:10, Peter Holm wrote: > >>On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 01:23:21AM -0400, Stephan Uphoff wrote: >> >>>On Fri, 2004-10-01 at 00:13, Stephan Uphoff wrote: >>> >>> >>>>I also had overlooked >>>> http://www.holm.cc/stress/log/cons80.html >>>>Showing that my patch for kern_switch.c (switch_patch) has a bug. >>>>I will send an updated patch later today. >>> >>>OK - here is the promised patch. >>> >> >>For once I'm the bearer of good news. The switch_patch_v2 + the >>sched_4bsd patch ran the tests for more than one hour without >>any freeze. The sched_4bsd alone did not stop the freezes. I'm >>now testing the switch_patch_v2 alone and it's looking good for >>55+ minutes of testing. > > > Great ! > I guess I should roll a cleaned up cumulative patch soon. > > Stephan I'm on the sidelines cheering.. I'm just coming off a hmmm.. 28 hour day from work.. ** need sleep **