From owner-freebsd-doc Fri Feb 9 11:38:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.184.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E29B37B6AC for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 11:38:22 -0800 (PST) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f19JcKV96320; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 14:38:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lowell) From: lgfbsd@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jadetex problems on handbook References: <44ofwbln5p.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net> <20010209200457.H27987@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu> Date: 09 Feb 2001 14:38:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu's message of "9 Feb 2001 20:07:03 +0100" Message-ID: <44d7crlk9g.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net> Lines: 16 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org sziszi@petra.hos.u-szeged.hu (Szilveszter Adam) writes: > Scrap that. Increase 'strings' to some high value. (maybe 2x as much) I'd even done that. It has no effect on the error, which indicates that TeX is running out of strings at 51,918. The teTeX default is 15,000, and I had set max_strings to 70,000 (as recommended) months ago. When I saw the failure, I increased it as high as 150,000, but the value in the error message stayed the same. I don't think any process limits are relevant. Aside from their being fairly maximal to start with, I'm pretty sure the process would be taking a signal instead of hitting an error condition that is detectable in-line. I can't think of anything else to check. - Lowell Gilbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message