From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 12 13:12:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D8616A420 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:12:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jona.joachim@gmail.com) Received: from pproxy.gmail.com (pproxy.gmail.com [64.233.166.181]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030B243D53 for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:12:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jona.joachim@gmail.com) Received: by pproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s49so536445pyc for ; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:12:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CznKcTPlmzBmYyR1rOEjrz24h3BBkO+0FTLt7lqceyeATG3Uzb1ow7DYOC4QhrFH1N08QNJrqA+6gn3oZ8XNzFaHoEpnOQWfBLAx2Tg012eFuadVqXE1hkNHIAuQD5OudiBsBOt5laJAJJBbaefgUJ8APtfftkUy6yCzH91fYPk= Received: by 10.35.127.7 with SMTP id e7mr1106265pyn; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:06:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?10.0.0.11? ( [83.99.102.68]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id k62sm659063pyk.2006.02.12.05.06.12; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 05:06:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43EF32C3.5040503@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 14:06:11 +0100 From: Jona Joachim User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060117) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Syntax of the INDEX file X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 13:12:59 -0000 Hi! I have a question concerning the syntax of the index file at the top of the ports tree. I read in a comment in bsd.port.mk (line 4827) that it should look like this: distribution-name|port-path|installation-prefix|comment| \ description-file|maintainer|categories|extract-depends| \ patch-depends|fetch-depends|build-depends|run-depends|www site However, this is not the case. I found out empirically that it looks like this: distribution-name|port-path|installation-prefix|comment| \ description-file|maintainer|categories|build-depends| \ run-depends|www site|extract-depends|patch-depends|fetch-depends Is that correct?