From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Dec 13 04:53:58 1995 Return-Path: owner-questions Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA07566 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 04:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from hornet.netac.co.za (hornet.netac.co.za [196.3.237.162]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id EAA07551 for ; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 04:53:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from tony@localhost) by hornet.netac.co.za (8.6.12/8.6.12) id OAA00678 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:53:02 +0200 From: Tony Harverson Message-Id: <199512131253.OAA00678@hornet.netac.co.za> Subject: 2.0.5->2.1 Upgrade ? To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 13 Dec 1995 14:53:01 +0200 (SAT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hey There all, Well, I just upgraded my 2.0.5 router to a 2.1 router and the only thing I can say at the moment is... *chant* We're not Worthy We're Not worthy ! *kowtow to Statue of Jordan* all hail the code god ! ;-) Seriously tho, it was a *very* nice way of doing things, but I have one question about the behavior... It seems to have nuked the sysconfig when It moved it over to the /usr/tmp/etc directory. (actually, let me clarify that - it had written the new version of sysconfig over the old version in /usr/tmp/etc/ . (this was not a major thing - I had the sysconfig file backed up on my other server, so the restore was really easy) Is this standard behavoir, or did noone else notice it ? btw : on comparison, this appeared to be the only file that wasn't put into the tmp directory properly - all the rest matched their backup copies.. Tony