From owner-cvs-all Sun Sep 19 11:37:15 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mail.af.airnet.ne.jp (mail.af.airnet.ne.jp [210.159.66.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA4215AC9; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 11:37:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imura@cs.titech.ac.jp) Received: from imura.cs.titech.ac.jp (tok108.airnet.ne.jp [210.159.88.108]) by mail.af.airnet.ne.jp (8.8.8/3.6W/06/13/98-AF.AIRNET.NE.JP) with ESMTP id DAA18074; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 03:37:01 +0900 Posted-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 03:36:34 +0900 (JST) To: andy@cgu.chel.su Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources In-Reply-To: <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su> References: <19990919174041U.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su> X-Prom-Mew: Prom-Mew 1.93.4 (procmail reader for Mew) From: "R. Imura" X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94b20 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 =?iso-2022-jp?B?KBskQkt2RSYyVhsoQik=?= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19990920033633G.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 03:36:33 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990401(IM113) Lines: 33 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Hi, From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Date: 19 Sep 1999 02:09:11 -0700 > I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic here, but if you want me to No, I was not. That was just for my curiosity. Asami-san's explanation is very easy to understand. Thank you. From: Andrey Zakhvatov Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:44:00 +0600 (ESS) > And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use > ${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff? > I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but.. > What your opinions? I think so, too. But, for example in the KDE's case, It have been difficult to install ${X11BASE} for me. I think it is better KDE installed to ${X11BASE}. Now I'm testing to do so by using idea of PR #13800. It may be possible. Does this trial have any problem? I'll change qt201/qt-i18n tomorrow. Thanks. --- R. Imura To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message