From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jul 6 12:32:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from hemi.metrotv.com (hemi.metrotv.com [209.98.153.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4BD537B403 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2001 12:32:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eric@metrotv.com) Received: (qmail 51378 invoked by uid 1009); 6 Jul 2001 19:35:29 -0000 Received: from remoteaccess-3.metrotv.com (HELO ?209.98.153.49?) (209.98.153.49) by hemi.metrotv.com with SMTP; 6 Jul 2001 19:35:29 -0000 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/9.0.1.3108 Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 14:29:04 -0500 Subject: Re: Is this a routing problem? From: Eric Long To: Manolo Valdes Cc: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <01070615273501.04051@proxy.atenas.cult.cu> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > if natd is enable when you ipfw list you should get > 00050 divert "natd port" ip from any to any via "natd_interface" > check the /etc/natd.conf and why /etc/rc.firewall are not loading the natd > rule As I said in a previous reply to someone else who pointed this out, I was a little off on my copy and paste of the ipfw rules. I do have the divert line. > check if your kernel was compiled with > options IPDIVERT # For Nat Yep, it's there. -Eric To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message