From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 1 17:52:45 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48B68106564A; Sun, 1 May 2011 17:52:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 071088FC16; Sun, 1 May 2011 17:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p41HdWGg003716; Sun, 1 May 2011 11:39:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p41HdWuf003713; Sun, 1 May 2011 11:39:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 11:39:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Sahil Tandon In-Reply-To: <20110501162748.GB26594@magic.hamla.org> Message-ID: References: <4DBCD165.8090508@forethought.net> <4DBD4200.2060404@gmail.com> <20110501162748.GB26594@magic.hamla.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 01 May 2011 11:39:32 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Reed Loefgren , freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maybe something useful, maybe not X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 May 2011 17:52:45 -0000 On Sun, 1 May 2011, Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 2011-05-01 at 07:20:32 -0400, Glen Barber wrote: > >> On 5/1/11 2:34 AM, Chris Rees wrote: >>>> "The geli utility is different than gbde" or as >>> >>> Please, no! >>> >>>> >>>> "The geli utility is different from gbde" >>> >>> Yes, that's correct. >> >> Any particular reason why this one over the previous? I think the >> previous suggestion sounds more correct. > > If I may propose a revision to the entire sentence: > > "The geli utility differs from gbde in that it offers other features > and uses an alternative cryptographic scheme." I'd suggest "The geli utility differs from gbde, offering other features and using a different cryptographic scheme." uses/using may not be necessary.