From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 28 19:40:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC0AE16A4D1 for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:40:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.westbend.net (ns1.westbend.net [216.47.253.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFBE43FBD for ; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:40:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hetzelsw@westbend.net) Received: from Admin02 (admin02.westbend.net [216.47.253.19]) by mail.westbend.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with SMTP id h9T3eHcu050723; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:40:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from hetzelsw@westbend.net) Message-ID: <007f01c39dce$6127d4d0$13fd2fd8@Admin02> From: "Scot W. Hetzel" To: "Dorin H." , References: <20031028203008.60637.qmail@web60303.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:39:35 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=8.0 tests=REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,USER_AGENT_OE version=2.43 Subject: Re: INDEX-5 is deleted then reconstructed by "make index" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 03:40:23 -0000 From: "Dorin H." > Hello everybody, > > The incantation to update the ports is according to > the list (after cvsuping the sources): > > 1. make index > 2. portsdb -u > 3. portversion -l "<" > ... > > Nevertheless, the "make index" starts by deleting the > INDEX-5 file; then it recreates INDEX-5. This takes > some considerable time. > Would it be possible to jump over "1.make index" and > go straight to step 2 (it would save a lot of > time...)? Or there are other artifacts created by > "make index" process? > The INDEX* files that you receive from cvsup are outdated, as these files are only occasionally updated in the ports CVS repository. Doing the 'make index' updates these files to contain the latest information as of the date you cvsuped. Otherwise when you run portsdb and portversion to check your ports collection, it'll report that your current packages are up to date, and you won't know that your ports are out of date. Scot