From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 04:34:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5547A1065670; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:34:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rea@codelabs.ru) Received: from 0.mx.codelabs.ru (0.mx.codelabs.ru [144.206.177.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7098FC1B; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:34:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=codelabs.ru; s=two; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=z2maF0p6cXCthx34laI1E9UunJPo4bHIy1yOLYD+yjE=; b=JDXlGVectGCA8gPM1U2DaXSl1I+k5NBejU4vvD/shQFAbkZk0rfgub25QX2e51nRnO9JV/b3yC1OW4FLo1lJCGSP+hE68e4Ryffjgix1/wtObKE3MmQLmBXQjbwF8CBC8wd3Zf4J6Oz8IBg/1yoHKvlYvHaExxdYliPO0dw2TZvr00rlQgvRdV4Mlfe2fP/zc88yX3tTZQpZbeF+1N7VEkQf9vjqkHV7gs5MJAosrx/iz2Qu5H4d/KqhY2OZOwvArhuCwlUf95pWkjTiudLmSYYpmhpWKdMH88j7byUC7TU1gHIH6hEtAw2nDB2Ckw2sKYoiODE0Uvzsjfc9DkzozA==; Received: from shadow.codelabs.ru (ppp91-77-186-141.pppoe.mtu-net.ru [91.77.186.141]) by 0.mx.codelabs.ru with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) id 1RflDp-0003XX-Vz; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:34:38 +0300 Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:34:33 +0400 From: Eygene Ryabinkin To: Doug Barton Message-ID: References: <4EF99DBC.6020204@FreeBSD.org> <4EFA21E7.1070006@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l76fUT7nc3MelDdI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EFA21E7.1070006@FreeBSD.org> Sender: rea@codelabs.ru X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:40:57 +0000 Cc: Pyun Yong-Hyeon , Brooks Davis , freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG, Garrett Cooper , Gleb Smirnoff , bz@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling Smorgrav , d@delphij.net, Xin LI Subject: Re: Annoying ERROR: 'wlan0' is not a DHCP-enabled interface X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 04:34:40 -0000 --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 11:52:07AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Ok, you win, I give up. >=20 > Do whatever you think is right. I expected another answer, but this one isn't bad either. Does that means that I can stick "Approved by: dougb" to the current variant of the patch? Or to the modified variant of it if I will decide to change the wording in rc.subr man page? I am ports committer after all, so I need the approval of some src committer(s) to make changes in the rc.d area. Thank you. --=20 Eygene Ryabinkin ,,,^..^,,, [ Life's unfair - but root password helps! | codelabs.ru ] [ 82FE 06BC D497 C0DE 49EC 4FF0 16AF 9EAE 8152 ECFB | freebsd.org ] --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iF4EAREIAAYFAk76nFkACgkQFq+eroFS7PvefgD/WyjHkhDLqOZdLDnczD2OofNH NDshZ+9+qUIoFiaNUCkBAJf3+T16XY0T4hLdWw1+lHdkWZSuOBhTeFDXibSWpse5 =hLYs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI--