From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 14:40:47 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E3016A4CE for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:40:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from www6.web2010.com (www6.web2010.com [216.157.5.254]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3E943D2D for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MLandman@face2interface.com) Received: from Delliver.face2interface.com (hrnaue@inoc202-203.veranet.net [216.238.202.203] (may be forged)) by www6.web2010.com (8.12.10/8.9.0) with ESMTP id j0KEefbV010285 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:40:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <6.2.0.14.0.20050120093504.01ee0448@mail.face2interface.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.0.14 Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:40:42 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Marty Landman Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: what release to install X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 14:40:47 -0000 I'm used to running fbsd 4.8 release on a sandbox server on my lan, from the mini-iso only. But now am looking at installing the full os from the two cd set. Is 5.3 release the recommended one to use at this time? My plan is to first install this on my xp box which is a year old and has dozens of free GB's on 4 windows partitions (one hd) and make it a dual bootable machine. Then I'd like to put it on another box with a p2-233 and about 8 free GB's on its three windows partitions. Is this all reasonable sounding? Marty Marty Landman, Face 2 Interface Inc. 845-679-9387 Search & Sort Easily: http://face2interface.com/Products/FormATable.shtml Web Installed Formmail: http://face2interface.com/formINSTal