From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 6 17:31: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from incandescent.firedrake.org (incandescent.firedrake.org [195.157.96.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4B137B674; Tue, 6 Jun 2000 17:31:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from float@firedrake.org) Received: from float by incandescent.firedrake.org with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian)) id 12zTkJ-0008UA-00; Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:30:59 +0100 Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:30:58 +0100 To: Kris Kennaway Cc: "Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO" , "'hackers@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20000607013058.A32270@firedrake.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:08:42PM -0700 From: void Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:08:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > You weren't listening..no-one debates the utility of auto-loading modules, > and that is the direction FreeBSD is already heading. The debate is over > the utility of automatically UNLOADING modules when they're "no longer in > use". Doesn't Solaris auto-unload unused drivers when memory gets tight? -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message