From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 18 17:51:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4DD07F6 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:51:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from icp-osb-irony-out9.external.iinet.net.au (icp-osb-irony-out9.external.iinet.net.au [203.59.1.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47762C0B for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:51:00 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvwKAFKGa1R8lKxs/2dsb2JhbABbgw6BLoI2thoGmxMCgRAWAQEBAQF9hAMBAQMBOj8FCwsNARMUEQ8FGDETiDgI0TcBAQEBBgEBAQEehjmKDUIHgy2BHgWeVYE0hjdAikaECYQPKTCBCIFDAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,411,1413216000"; d="scan'208";a="569559759" Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.phoenix) ([124.148.172.108]) by icp-osb-irony-out9.iinet.net.au with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2014 01:50:58 +0800 Received: by smtp.phoenix (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CC95FBC7; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:50:57 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:50:57 +1100 From: andrew clarke To: David Newman Subject: Re: upgrading 9.3 / ZFS v28 Message-ID: <20141118175057.GA6144@ozzmosis.com> References: <54697AA5.6040804@networktest.com> <20141117123929.GB60429@ozzmosis.com> <546A1538.4040801@networktest.com> <20141117181527.GA62908@ozzmosis.com> <546A91D4.3070009@networktest.com> <20141118064714.GA75897@ozzmosis.com> <546B8040.1090508@networktest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <546B8040.1090508@networktest.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:51:01 -0000 On Tue 2014-11-18 09:22:08 UTC-0800, David Newman (dnewman@networktest.com) wrote: > You're correct about incorrect usage of index numbers. I should just be > using '-i 1' for all disks. > > Previously I used bogus values '-i 2' and '-i 3'. Is it sufficient to > rerun the gpart bootcode with '-i 1' to correct this, or are other > remedial steps needed? I think -i 1 on all disks should be enough. The bogus values were most likely harmless but if you're at all concerned by potential data loss then it might be worthwhile running "zpool scrub". > Thanks again for your help. You're welcome. Regards Andrew