From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  5 16:00:51 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C8B5403;
 Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:00:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423728FC0A;
 Mon,  5 Nov 2012 16:00:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
 [212.40.38.101])
 by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA05239;
 Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:00:47 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <5097E2AF.2010000@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:00:47 +0200
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121029 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Volodymyr Kostyrko <c.kworr@gmail.com>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: buildworld fails on recent stable
References: <5097A5E0.2000502@gmail.com> <5097D27E.1050705@FreeBSD.org>
 <5097DE5E.6020405@FreeBSD.org> <5097E0BD.50909@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5097E0BD.50909@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:00:51 -0000

on 05/11/2012 17:52 Volodymyr Kostyrko said the following:
> I bet on clang 3.2.

Thank you for checking.

So how do we proceed from here?
I could just revert the MFC-es, but the functionality could be desirable to some
users.  Are there any alternatives?

-- 
Andriy Gapon