From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 12 12:23:49 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250C01065670 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:23:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f50.google.com (mail-vw0-f50.google.com [209.85.212.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20F18FC1A for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so4419462vws.37 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:23:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=NdwNSui8qnSf+pCxQzYQgFpdNNXTuMRg/9R60iY66TA=; b=o3QEYEm24CawgoxUiolTTkCUr6wtt2H4zNEQWcOjvyrexePmibFnbFuAdkcm93awdy /6/42dxghrYb/XnVamORSTOcA3+NkNAh9qI5JZik9M8k/sjBd+PqvSF3YSskfBoEA3vs ADYGBp3OUW32DkKdFuUkoc1fNR4aXFNiTDrUM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.64.171 with SMTP id p11mr1205004vds.529.1315830227973; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:23:47 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.161.138 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 05:23:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:23:47 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e02a78_Q4_O8qTCJwRV6Y4tmgsc Message-ID: From: Adrian Chadd To: Berislav Purgar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] if_ath_tx: change interrupt scheduling deferral X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:23:49 -0000 On 12 September 2011 20:18, Berislav Purgar wrote: > for now seams to be ok . no errors on both sides (9280/5416) Good-o. Blah, this bug is really irking me. Ok, I'm going to continue working on BAW tracking, filtered frames, TIM/ATIM and handling BAR TX. I think that's the only real outstanding issues before I merge this first lot of work into -HEAD. I'll just keep tinkering on the issue on the side and see if I can elicit any further helpful logging when the condition occurs. I'll let you know when I've committed something next to test. Would you mind re-running the iperf tests in both directions? Let me know what the throughput is like? Thanks, Adrian