Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:23:47 +0800 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [patch] if_ath_tx: change interrupt scheduling deferral Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmokwa3j_pa4bWuDByxzkOBZ5vdW9eEgCwCq=6S=mE649Yg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAAUsrB5FYpPTcT5R0Oh99G_rdzfDJvuBLuiJ%2Bo5jK-hNfQviGA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmoknpF_RhiXWL07GSOqWoHpy3L5Ma4kCptHq9MtfbfPO8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUsrB4KYaH-uyG_1BiGywZ%2BGOP%2BmBpnw3UO15c767vfQmC5BA@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokMvNiHe_XjoSNFfsnnY1%2BfdmaepsN8gqz8yRLvz=sysQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUsrB5_EDJECAMfS5qrAjPXzmW-0y8vgHd=5C18H=gyqebT3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmokMRXmonkxz9XoS6%2BmT_qa2UD4TvHQLz_HX-K07XSDu9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAAUsrB5FYpPTcT5R0Oh99G_rdzfDJvuBLuiJ%2Bo5jK-hNfQviGA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 September 2011 20:18, Berislav Purgar <bpurgar@gmail.com> wrote: > for now seams to be ok . no errors on both sides (9280/5416) Good-o. Blah, this bug is really irking me. Ok, I'm going to continue working on BAW tracking, filtered frames, TIM/ATIM and handling BAR TX. I think that's the only real outstanding issues before I merge this first lot of work into -HEAD. I'll just keep tinkering on the issue on the side and see if I can elicit any further helpful logging when the condition occurs. I'll let you know when I've committed something next to test. Would you mind re-running the iperf tests in both directions? Let me know what the throughput is like? Thanks, Adrian
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmokwa3j_pa4bWuDByxzkOBZ5vdW9eEgCwCq=6S=mE649Yg>