From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 9 16:26:19 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id QAA27984 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 16:26:19 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA27979 for ; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 16:26:15 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA01803; Mon, 9 Oct 1995 16:26:07 -0700 To: Charles Kenneth Green - PRC cc: hackers@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiprocessor support In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 09 Oct 1995 15:14:49 EDT." <199510091914.PAA01722@fang.cs.sunyit.edu> Date: Mon, 09 Oct 1995 16:26:07 -0700 Message-ID: <1801.813281167@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > on implementing multiprocessor support in freeBSD. The professor is very > excited about this prospect but he is not sure if he'll be able to convince > the C.S. department to "enhance" the rules so that this might be done. I wonder what sorts of "enhancements" could conceivably be necessary for a professor to implement a perfectly reasonable operating systems research project? The only person I know who has currently done any sort of hacking on SMP is Jack Vogel , but be also warned that Mr. Vogel is firmly governed by the laws of Heisenberg: You can plot his position or you can plot his velocity, but you can never derive them both simultaneously! :-) Jordan