From owner-freebsd-current Tue May 6 11:52:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA27983 for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 May 1997 11:52:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alpo.whistle.com (alpo.whistle.com [207.76.204.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA27974 for ; Tue, 6 May 1997 11:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by alpo.whistle.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA01528; Tue, 6 May 1997 11:39:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from current1.whistle.com(207.76.205.22) via SMTP by alpo.whistle.com, id smtpd001525; Tue May 6 18:39:41 1997 Message-ID: <336F7AE6.7AAE88DB@whistle.com> Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 11:39:34 -0700 From: Julian Elischer Organization: Whistle Communications X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.0Gold (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kenjiro Cho CC: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PRU_OLDSTYLE in current References: <199705061629.BAA01994@hotaka.csl.sony.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Kenjiro Cho wrote: > > I have noticed the following situation: > PRU_OLDSTYLE has been removed from "sys/protosw.h". > If you include netkey, netatalk, or netns, the current kernel panics > in domaininit. > Even when you specify PRU_OLDSTYLE, a kernel won't compile because > "extern struct pr_usrreqs pru_oldstyle" is missing in "sys/protosw.h". > > My question is: > should all the existing protocols move to the new pr_usrreqs? > or > should PRU_OLDSTYLE be put back to "sys/protosw.h" until all the > protocols move to the new style? well theoretically I should be doing the netatalk code and archie should be doing the ipdivert code, but neither of us has a -current machine at this time. >From previous 'lore' it would have been garret's job to make a cursory try at these himself when he made the changes, but he didn't so I guess We'll get around to fixing them when we have time and machines.