Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 13 Jul 2021 19:53:47 +0200
From:      "Herbert J. Skuhra" <herbert@gojira.at>
To:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gnutls requires unbound?
Message-ID:  <87fswixfpw.wl-herbert@gojira.at>
In-Reply-To: <4D1ABE1F-81B8-4111-85FB-ADE47F54C107@kreme.com>
References:  <4D1ABE1F-81B8-4111-85FB-ADE47F54C107@kreme.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 13 Jul 2021 16:00:29 +0200, "@lbutlr" wrote:
> 
> When updating gnutls, the port requires and installs unbound. This
> is despitee the fact that bind is already installed why is a second
> DNS server required for gnutls? Unbound is not running on the system
> (nor could it be, since the DNS ports are bound to bind).

Yes libunbound.so is required, if you enable option DANE (off by
default).

DANE_DESC=              Certificate verification via DNSSEC
DANE_LIB_DEPENDS=       libunbound.so:dns/unbound
DANE_CONFIGURE_ENABLE=  libdane

--
Herbert



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?87fswixfpw.wl-herbert>