From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jul 11 10:21:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE20237B400 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from web13607.mail.yahoo.com (web13607.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.175.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A222C43E3B for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:21:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rarmente@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20020711172137.90872.qmail@web13607.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.144.38.4] by web13607.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:21:37 PDT Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:21:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Roberto Armenteros Subject: Major difference btw FreeBSD's permision system and Win2k's To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG MS introduced a more rigorous file permision system in Win2k. Now they have individual permisions just like unix does on files "pluss a lot of optios to monitor what has been done to any file." I would like to know if this method is as powerful as the unix method of file permisions. For example, i would like to know where unix stores the permision for a specific file and the similar procedure for win2k and then analyze which one is better. THanks a lot... Roberto.. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free http://sbc.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message