From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Sep 3 13:10:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA11037 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:10:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA10955; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 13:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA294879520; Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:05:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Sep 1998 15:05:19 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Anyone running FrontPage with Apache on stable/current? In-Reply-To: <10090.904796602@gjp.erols.com> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I don't advocate the technology, I'm [was] merely stating that it's hard to move from NT --> FreeBSD, because the lack of ASP support. On a side note, perhaps apache::asp should be fetched and built by default by the apache*-fp ports. It has a few dependencies but would be really neat to see. On Thu, 3 Sep 1998, Gary Palmer wrote: > Bill Fumerola wrote in message ID > : > > Three words: Active Server Pages, try them in *nix. > > ASPs should be discouraged at any rate. They are not cachable content. Perhaps > M$ likes having more traffic to their web servers than they really need, but > as an ISP I'd rather keep the traffic local... - bill fumerola [root/billf]@chc-chimes.com - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800)252.2421 x128 / bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - BF1560 - "Logic, like whiskey, loses its beneficial effect when taken in too large quantities" -Lord Dunsany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message