From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 4 22:19:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEB7E106568A for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331368FC17 for ; Mon, 4 Aug 2008 22:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <4897808C.4030603@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:19:56 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <18736784.post@talk.nabble.com> <48909534.9040608@FreeBSD.org> <48971F22.3000601@carebears.mine.nu> <48975C9B.9040103@FreeBSD.org> <20080804165237.39f79c49@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20080804165237.39f79c49@scorpio> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: When gcc43 is expected to be in base? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2008 22:19:57 -0000 Gerard wrote: > On Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:46:35 +0200 > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>> Isn't possible to add GPLv3 code in the base system? >>> (By possible I mean the license part, not the technical part;) >>> >> There is a strong preference not to do this. > > Doing a totally unscientific investigation reveals that the trend seems > to be towards the use of GPLv3 license. As a 'claws-mail' user myself, > I know that, that caused a problem with the 'ClamAV' plug-in that was > formerly used by 'claws-mail' > > Since it appears to be apparent that newer software might very well be > released under the GPLv3 license, it might behoove the FreeBSD team to > rethink its ideas or beliefs regarding the inclusion of such software > into the base system. At the very least, it might very well make life > easier for end users who need the support that programs using that > license are now offering. > > Then again, I could be wrong. Just my 2ยข. > If and when a sufficiently compelling conflict arises, I am sure it will receive due attention. Kris