From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sun Aug 7 19:10:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC71BB12B5; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 19:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C26B18B3; Sun, 7 Aug 2016 19:10:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bWTT7-0001iS-4w; Sun, 07 Aug 2016 22:10:41 +0300 Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2016 22:10:41 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Andrey Chernov Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, Oliver Pinter , Bruce Simpson , Warner Losh , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Subject: Re: svn commit: r303716 - head/crypto/openssh Message-ID: <20160807191041.GW8192@zxy.spb.ru> References: <32b82f9f-7f78-6358-030a-90aed54bb8a8@freebsd.org> <0740b662-4a36-f834-229a-d16a5a6dde14@freebsd.org> <20160807173734.GD22212@zxy.spb.ru> <2dd7e952-ca28-57cb-ac8a-39d895b51d06@freebsd.org> <20160807182317.GE22212@zxy.spb.ru> <20160807185237.GV8192@zxy.spb.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2016 19:10:43 -0000 On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:02:52PM +0300, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 07.08.2016 21:52, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> Why you still not > >> send your opinion to the author? > >> > > > > I am not sure about suitable response from autor. > > May be project [FreeBSD] choise some compromise. > > IMHO blindly choosing some compromise without asking author's opinion > first will be unwise. I will be glad in case someone from secteam@ > discuss that with the author. Moreover, careless attempt to stay > compatible by any price can weak connections passed out of the server room. > In generaly I am accept this. For this specific case enforcing strong crypo like Internet filtering from suicide.