Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:48:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 205162] [NEW PORT] mail/postfix-dovecot2: Slave port with DOVECOT2 option enabled Message-ID: <bug-205162-13-cOg4Y4Etk8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-205162-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-205162-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D205162 Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #166408|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #166409|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #166409|maintainer-approval?(ohauer | Flags|@FreeBSD.org) | --- Comment #4 from Olli Hauer <ohauer@FreeBSD.org> --- Created attachment 166994 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D166994&action= =3Dedit [patch] dovecot is supported out of the box After study the postfix HISTORY and knowing dovecot is not needed to build dovecot SASL support I will commit something like the new patch. At the moment my main issue is to find good short SASL_DESC so users are to much confused about the removal of the DOVECOT(2) OPTION. Additional help for SASL will be provided via pkg-help, there we have the ability to write more text the in the ${OPTION}_DESC line. Let me know what you think, any help with better wording is welcome. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-205162-13-cOg4Y4Etk8>