Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 14:07:57 -0800 From: "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org> To: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> Cc: Sepherosa Ziehau <sepherosa@gmail.com>, "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Intel 82574L (em) Message-ID: <CAHM0Q_P3PT9u8hD_cZ8bdxB=kNbQMrEN87uwd-9_dxKLjLT4ng@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <54DBC9D6.7020602@ignoranthack.me> References: <54CBF396.3090903@ignoranthack.me> <CAMOc5cwG%2BmbcArAt5xSjKYrbZeA40ETZUPgi4y51r_GYYsitQw@mail.gmail.com> <54DBC9D6.7020602@ignoranthack.me>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > I'm interested in doing this a bit as I now have 5 em(4) interfaces on > my soon to be router box. > > I tried modifying the driver to allow num_queues to be raised and I > compiled with EM_MULTIQUEUE set, and all I got for my trouble was > kernel panics. > > I'm not sure if the code even works. > IIRC that was really just enabling buf_ring usage. In any event I don't think it's been maintained in upwards of 7 years. -K
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHM0Q_P3PT9u8hD_cZ8bdxB=kNbQMrEN87uwd-9_dxKLjLT4ng>