From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 16:26:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E04CC16A420 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:26:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EA243D66 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:26:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sequethin@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i22so1222396wra for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HPS4UkLflbwORCFJpt/RliutVUVqsB5l44LUOyfWca2GrqDcNR3m5PAfq2yQMr+/BhrTmddrC+eURhLb7g4J1FXQJ0pvVqRVAl7a+xXcutGrIfTcAkA8MHWfYxnbRNTlVWWwMj4TaAs0A9u9+0Rsefc1JiDscYVlpGbBLs9UfDc= Received: by 10.54.111.2 with SMTP id j2mr703890wrc; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.68.20 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 09:26:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3060c23905091009262af72f91@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:26:45 -0400 From: Mike Hernandez To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200509091210.09717.zettel@acm.org> Cc: Subject: Re: What is fsck trying to tell me? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: sequethin@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:26:51 -0000 On 9/10/05, Jan Grant wrote: > You're using the default "whole slice" partition, ad1s1c. My guess is, > you're using the default disklabel for that slice. Jan is right. The only time I've had the above issue though, was when I was trying to fsck an ext2 partition without having the proper stuff installed (e2fsprogs). My error though, of course, was "fsck: exec fsck_ext2fs.....", as opposed to "fsck_unused". In this case it looks like fsck is doing what it can but as Jan said, the type for the c partition is unused. Mike