From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 5 00:50:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8351016A4E1 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 00:50:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942D343D58 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2006 00:50:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k650oOpg008838; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 18:50:29 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <44AB0C96.3090400@samsco.org> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 18:49:26 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Talon References: <20060704212432.GA57426@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20060704212432.GA57426@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Locking Issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2006 00:50:34 -0000 Michel Talon wrote: >>BTW, I noticed yesterday that that IPv6 support committ to rpc.lockd was never >>backed out. An immediate question for people experiencing new rpc.lockd >>problems with 6.x should be whether or not backing out that change helps. > > > So it may be relevant to say that i have kernels without IPV6 support. > Recall that i have absolutely no problem with the client in FreeBSD-6.1. > Tomorrow i will test one of the 6.1 machines as a NFS server and the other as > a client, and will make you know if i see something. > > As to the problems you mention about NFS Linux, yes i have seen a lot since > years. But to my surprise FC5 seems to work well. By the way it is kernel > 2.6.16 so sufficiently recent for the problems to have been ironed out, > presumably. > > > 2.6.16 should be OK. I've heard of problems with cookie and handle sizes with it, but only under highly unusual circumstances. Scott