From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 7 10:12:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43E616A4B3 for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from anor.ics.muni.cz (anor.ics.muni.cz [147.251.4.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9C0543FAF for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 10:12:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hopet@ics.muni.cz) Received: from kloboucek ([141.244.220.140]) (user=hopet mech=LOGIN bits=0) by anor.ics.muni.cz (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h97HC6ga030230 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:12:07 +0200 From: "Petr Holub" To: Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2003 19:12:08 +0200 Message-ID: <01cc01c38cf6$23a8e2e0$2136fb93@kloboucek> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0 In-Reply-To: <200310071701.h97H1g73075873@freefall.freebsd.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Muni-Spam-TestIP: 141.244.220.140 X-Muni-Virus-Test: Clean Subject: RE: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: devel/jrtplib X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 17:12:10 -0000 Hi, what I found on that page is following: File: jrtplib.html has 1 possible URL: 0 OK, 0 bad, 1 skipped Port maintainer: hopet@ics.muni.cz http://lumumba.luc.ac.be/jori/jrtplib/jrtplib.html: Not checked (Last actual result NEVER [checked 0 times since Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969 ]) File: jrtplib-2.7.tar.gz has 1 possible URL: 0 OK, 0 bad, 1 skipped Port maintainer: hopet@ics.muni.cz http://lumumba.luc.ac.be/jori/jrtplib/jrtplib-2.7.tar.gz: Not checked (Last actual result NEVER [checked 0 times since Wed Dec 31 16:00:00 1969 ]) Summary 0 files fetchable out of 2 Where is the problem? Both URLs are OK. Cheers, Petr ================================================================ Petr Holub CESNET z.s.p.o. Supercomputing Center Brno Zikova 4 Institute of Compt. Science 162 00 Praha 6, CZ Masaryk University Czech Republic Botanicka 68a, 60200 Brno, CZ e-mail: Petr.Holub@cesnet.cz phone: +420-541512272 fax: +420-541212747 e-mail: hopet@ics.muni.cz > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill "distfiles" Fenner [mailto:fenner@FreeBSD.org] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 7:02 PM > To: hopet@ics.muni.cz > Subject: FreeBSD ports: 1 unfetchable distfiles: devel/jrtplib > > > Dear hopet@ics.muni.cz, > > You are listed as the FreeBSD port maintainer for 1 port > whose distfiles [or main web pages] are not fetchable from their > MASTER_SITES. Could you please visit > > http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/hopet@ics.muni.cz.html > > and correct the problems listed there? The individual port with > a problem is devel/jrtplib. > > Note that the main port web page, as listed in the WWW: line > of the pkg-descr, is checked just as though it was a port distfile. > This is an unfortunate side effect of the architecture of the distfile > survey reporting tool, but if you see a distfile being reported as > not fetchable that's not actually a distfile, see if it's from the > pkg-descr. > > If you have already corrected the problems and submitted a > PR, please accept my thanks and apologies for the delay in getting the > fixes into the tree. This reminder is created automatically and does > not (yet) have a way to know if a PR fixing the problem has been > submitted. Please do *NOT* send your response to me directly; I do > not always have time to commit your fix; please instead submit a PR > via 'send-pr' so it doesn't get lost. > > Problems are usually of two types: > 1. The software package has been upgraded and the version in the > port has been removed. The best solution to this problem is to > upgrade the port to the most current version of the software package. > If you are a FreeBSD committer, then you can just upgrade the port > directly. If not, you should create the updated port on your own machine, > test it (and maybe even run "portlint" on it), and then use "send-pr" > to submit a "diff -uNr old-port updated-port". If you added or deleted > any files, please make an explicit note of it. > > 2. The mirror site being used no longer contains the software package > in question, or no longer exists. Solutions include: > a) If there are other mirror sites, just remove the bad site > from the list. (Make sure that what appears to be a bad site > isn't actually a problem of type 1, upgrade) > b) If the README or other support files in the software > documentation mention where to get the software package, > use one of those sites. > c) Use ftpsearch (http://ftpsearch.ntnu.no/ftpsearch) or other > search engines to find another place to get the original > DISTFILES. Make sure that you don't pick a FreeBSD distfiles > mirror -- if you can't find any other places where the file > exists, it can be a LOCAL_PORT or you can simply comment out > the MASTER_SITES= line, with a comment explaining why. > Once you have a solution, use "send-pr" to submit a "diff -u" of the > Makefile. > > Note that this isn't an urgent issue, as people who try to > build the port now will just fall back to the FreeBSD distfiles mirror. > Please just put it on your list to do and get to it when you have time. > These messages will continue to arrive twice a month until the fix is > committed, as a reminder. > > Thanks, > Bill "distfiles" Fenner. >