From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 2 18:37:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92FB71065670 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505838FC0A for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 18:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q62IbLvZ005960; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:37:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q62IbLJM005957; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:37:21 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 12:37:21 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Zoran Kolic In-Reply-To: <20120702160031.GA1012@faust> Message-ID: References: <20120629160641.GA1176@mycenae.sbb.rs> <20120629112221.39453cd2@tsunami> <20120702160031.GA1012@faust> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 02 Jul 2012 12:37:21 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Joe Ennis Subject: Re: new desktop box X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 18:37:27 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jul 2012, Zoran Kolic wrote: >> I run an 8120, it is a bulldozer however. I overclock it by adjusting >> the multiplier in the bios. Stock freq is 3.1GHZ and I run it at 4.2 GHz >> with an increase in Vcore of only 0.125V cooling with air. Solid as a >> rock. > > How about heating? > >> - buildworld runs about 20min. >> - buildkernel runs about 6min. > > That is what matters. :) If you use gcc, devel/ccache can improve that a lot. ccache also works with clang, but does not seem very effective.