From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 20 23:03:00 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-Hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2125816A400 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: from digitaldaemon.com (digitaldaemon.com [63.105.9.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A94B013C489 for ; Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:02:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jan@digitaldaemon.com) Received: (qmail 22726 invoked by uid 98); 20 Apr 2007 23:02:58 -0000 Received: from 63.105.9.34 by digitaldaemon.com (envelope-from , uid 89) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.87/1195. Clear:RC:1(63.105.9.34):. Processed in 0.078966 secs); 20 Apr 2007 23:02:58 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: jan@digitaldaemon.com via digitaldaemon.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(63.105.9.34):. Processed in 0.078966 secs) Received: from digitaldaemon.com (HELO ?80.175.151.2?) (63.105.9.34) by digitaldaemon.com with SMTP; 20 Apr 2007 23:02:58 -0000 Message-ID: <46294699.7040501@digitaldaemon.com> Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:02:49 -0400 From: Jan Knepper User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andy Hilker References: <45F1C355.8030504@digitaldaemon.com> <20070310082316.K64466@mignon.ki.iif.hu> <4628D3EA.6060405@digitaldaemon.com> <20070420192041.GA83236@mail.crypta.net> In-Reply-To: <20070420192041.GA83236@mail.crypta.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Hackers Subject: Re: Multiple IP Jail's patch for FreeBSD 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:03:00 -0000 Andy Hilker wrote: > Hi, > > You (Jan Knepper) wrote: > >> Any change this can be included officially at some point? >> > > Yes, this would be really nice. Especially because it would not be > conflicting with using freebsd-update (without an own build server). > Probably should be a configuration option (kernel config). Jan