Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:11:24 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Gustau Perez <gperez@entel.upc.edu>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@freebsd.org, das@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Inline definition problem in current Message-ID: <49CA65BC.7060704@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090325044408.GB17442@zim.MIT.EDU> References: <49C80DBA.80407@entel.upc.edu> <20090325033451.GA17442@zim.MIT.EDU> <49C9A7B4.3080509@FreeBSD.org> <20090325044408.GB17442@zim.MIT.EDU>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David Schultz wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2009, Doug Barton wrote: >> I am trying to compile gimp on -current right now and x11/babl and >> graphics/gegl both have this problem. Take a look at >> http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/i386-8-failure.html for more >> examples (click on the link on the right under Package to see the >> logs). There are currently over 600 broken ports in -current, all the >> ones I clicked on in a completely bogus sample had this same problem. > > My bug; I missed an important line when merging from gcc trunk 122565. > Instead of reporting: > > error: nested function 'foo' declared but never defined > > gcc should have been reporting: > > warning: inline function 'foo' declared but never defined > > I'll check in a fix as soon as I run a buildworld. Thanks for jumping on this. With your latest version the two ports I mentioned above compile just fine with no modifications to the source. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49CA65BC.7060704>