Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 02:35:33 +1000 From: Dima Panov <fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diablo-jdk- misses libodbcinst.so & conflicts libiodbc/virtuoso Message-ID: <251591294158933@web155.yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <20110104162757.GT34314@home.opsec.eu> References: <201101041437.08402.david@vizion2000.net> <4D233619.1000305@DataIX.net> <289781294155870@web149.yandex.ru> <20110104162757.GT34314@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello! 05.01.2011, 02:27, "Kurt Jaeger" <lists@opsec.eu>: > Hi! > > Dima Panov write: > >> šjhell@dataix.net wrote: >>> šReplace libiodbc with unixODBC >>> >>> šThey provide the same layer that virtuoso would need for ODBC. >> šNope. unixODBC provide outdated API and lacks of some features, >> šexist in libiodbc and required by virtuoso. > > Ah, interesting. What's the difference ? Sorry, I'm not an odbc profi to provide a correct answer, please search in virtuoso mailinglists, reasons was published AFAIR before switching to libiodbc. > So a drive to replace unixODBC in every port would be more useful ? yes. anyway, unixODBC was staled some time ago, and now no reasons to continue support it qt4/kde4 was switched to libiodbc some months ago. -- Dima Panov (fluffy@FreeBSD.org) KDE@FreeBSD team Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/?id=100000181104157
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?251591294158933>