From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 28 18:06:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3794106566C for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:06:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scheidell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net [216.134.223.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E5388FC14 for ; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (unknown [10.71.0.54]) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8749BD23C15; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:58 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: SpammerTrap(r) VPS-1500 2.18 at mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net Received: from USBCTDC001.secnap.com (unknown [10.70.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx2.secnap.com.ionspam.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0824AD23C03; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from MikeBook-Air.local (10.80.0.4) by USBCTDC001.secnap.com (10.70.1.1) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.722.0; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:56 -0400 Message-ID: <4F735340.1020103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:06:56 -0400 From: Michael Scheidell Organization: SECNAP Network Security Corp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; en-US; rv:1.9.2.20) Gecko/20110804 Thunderbird/3.1.12 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Philip M. Gollucci" References: <4F732C89.3040804@FreeBSD.org> <4F733432.4020902@FreeBSD.org> <63ca1b333a310ecc2b1d1f0e1e1542a1.squirrel@mail.experts-exchange.com> <4F7338C3.8020003@p6m7g8.com> <4F733C3A.7020004@missouri.edu> <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> In-Reply-To: <4F734524.2000400@p6m7g8.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees , Jason Helfman Subject: Re: FAQ on PORTREVISION bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:06:59 -0000 On 3/28/12 1:06 PM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > On 03/28/12 16:28, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: >> But, for example, it seems to me that PORTREVISION should NOT be bumped >> if a LIB_DEPENDS changes, and it is not a major library revision change. >> For example, in this case the portmaster program reinstalls the library >> only, and changes the +CONTENTS and +REQUIRED_BY of the various >> installed packages appropriately. And the program will still work just >> fine. So PORTREVISION should not be bumped. > I'm fairly sure thats exactly backwards. I believe you're talking about > our 'Chase sh lib version bump' commits which most definitely require a > bump even if the major version doesn't change, b/c the old packages will > reference the old library. > > Take devel/apr-1 for example. So, basically, you do enough pr's, you will bump portrevision and someone will complain, and you will skip bumping portrevision and someone will complain :-) 10 programmers, 15 opinions. -- Michael Scheidell, CTO >*| * SECNAP Network Security Corporation d: +1.561.948.2259 w: http://people.freebsd.org/~scheidell