From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 31 10:29:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mandree.no-ip.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4FA8C4; Fri, 31 May 2013 10:29:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mandree@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA07C23CEB6; Fri, 31 May 2013 12:29:57 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <51A87BA5.9060203@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 12:29:57 +0200 From: Matthias Andree User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Wilke Subject: Re: svn commit: r319381 - head/www/aria References: <201305291544.r4TFivp9038121@svn.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201305291544.r4TFivp9038121@svn.freebsd.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 10:29:59 -0000 Am 29.05.2013 17:44, schrieb Martin Wilke: > Author: miwi > Date: Wed May 29 15:44:57 2013 > New Revision: 319381 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/319381 > > Log: > - Mark Jobs unsafe > > Modified: > head/www/aria/Makefile > > Modified: head/www/aria/Makefile > ============================================================================== > --- head/www/aria/Makefile Wed May 29 15:41:00 2013 (r319380) > +++ head/www/aria/Makefile Wed May 29 15:44:57 2013 (r319381) > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ USE_GNOME= gtk12 > USE_OPENSSL= yes > USE_GMAKE= yes > GNU_CONFIGURE= yes > -MAKE_JOBS_SAFE= yes > +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE= yes > > CPPFLAGS+= -I${LOCALBASE}/include > LDFLAGS+= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib > Did you file a PR to the maintainer? I'd consider failure to build in parallel a bug these days. Perhaps we can stipulate that through the porter's handbook, and I think it is about time we forced all ports not marked UNSAFE to build in parallel...