From owner-freebsd-current Sun Feb 16 17:57: 7 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A317437B401 for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:57:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51.attbi.com [204.127.198.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2830443F3F for ; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:57:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org (12-232-168-4.client.attbi.com[12.232.168.4]) by rwcrmhc51.attbi.com (rwcrmhc51) with ESMTP id <2003021701570505100kcofae>; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 01:57:05 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA07683; Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:57:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:57:03 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer To: Bruce Evans Cc: FreeBSD current users Subject: Re: resource usage overflow In-Reply-To: <20030217121418.V4039-100000@gamplex.bde.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Bruce Evans wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > 3/ would 64 bits be enough? We are getting both bigger and faster > > 64000 times faster and 64000 times bigger and we are back at seven > > seconds. 640 times faster and 640 times bigger and we are still only at > > 70000 seconds (19 hours) before overflow. > > Er, 64 bit longs provide a factor of 4 billion (not 64000) for bloat. > not that I said 64000 twice... multiply them.. > Bruce > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message