From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 08:35:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EF41BC10A2 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22a.google.com (mail-wm0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7221A43 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f65so152556969wmi.0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:34:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bx4+RaBtyR5+8j6B3BsYYs+i9nkeP0+N59ExOZmIznA=; b=XToMOdMf4QYtlzOd91sGkeefsjQvHjtvZqUf8NcJK/qcfnsKbeMJCesfo/qUYoueYF EfaeNWdWXuzcK+4sTSZMHSn35fY5b3C3uAguA81VFXKUYQXv2x65YQrpqoGiAQjBb2aS JUrbFXhdHF0Jz3GwtqJEc8V8IXHzmiGRiXs+KhTJmt0h50yk9ED/toLlpmZvL+/28CJS Mgb6TmpCHqxrhbyaqE1T6Zue1diHhdIfrW8ncTC2w5uoBACsKdykbiL0nq2rx1jXe755 9BlSKpQXGHMgBAH+u6abaYL+80Bt+/RMB6p7NTkrP2KA2tpDvcKirnk8WT0qA0rjOJkz jGZg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bx4+RaBtyR5+8j6B3BsYYs+i9nkeP0+N59ExOZmIznA=; b=agHobew2oHEqwWGHR2cRJ7vuEuh2b/JQ+il/rvefQaFfli7TKyb+fx6r6y6e0+l5DM jOnGVI4D8bHFJzefBzhR4LFDEYg0xXsNIvskZqJwo2lg3WZHsEgoIVtHWW0jQiSzhGyI XMOFaFMzV4Js0jA8nYAik0jzvbK9wa9eeVE0Y5Y3iDxYFtCwLMV9TIZvswM+FPi/b03s m1tM8nGUC1XhRY4PYdXzvDl9TTCZTYioisonzAJUtxmquiPEKURY0ocrZzc9rzjUkXIe qfNASxjg1/Nk/J197W1osuwD1S/sdJU2E9BlJ7hHnCImx58RA9JM77AyPz02VK+idKSR Ql4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuaeWJJU+7RR2N5en0zX7Qu69Z8Ofblmt8XJDjQcXluDPpBzikeEDjJi7WxC/2VxiYay/D65Fci143JEw== X-Received: by 10.28.1.74 with SMTP id 71mr20139979wmb.4.1471941298244; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:34:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.54.202 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:34:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160822150455.GA87440@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> References: <20160815145419.GA3619@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <20160815231414.GA84125@neutralgood.org> <20160820105438.GA59960@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <86lgzq1510.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <20160821174246.GA73293@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> <86h9aelz9g.fsf@WorkBox.Home> <20160822150455.GA87440@admin.sibptus.transneft.ru> From: krad Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:34:57 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Root on ZFS, LiveCD and BE To: Victor Sudakov Cc: "Brandon J. Wandersee" , "Kevin P. Neal" , FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:35:00 -0000 If you are really that worried about the pool in question and potential damage I would do an image of the drive(s) before doing anything. Than you can restore if anything does go horribly wrong. I'm suprised nobody has mentioned this. On 22 August 2016 at 16:04, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Brandon J. Wandersee wrote: > > > > > I'll check with the stable version of beadm in bhyve tomorrow, but > > > please note that BE selection made by beadm-devel itself (from a > > > working system) works perfectly. It's only the loader BE selection > > > menu that has this problem. > > I have just verified, the boot menu problem is the same no matter if > beadm of beadm-devel were used for BE creation. > > > > > I just set up boot environments for the first time with sysutils/beadm > > last week myself, so this seemed like as good a time as any to create > > one and try it out. I get the same behavior: activating a boot > > environment from a running system and rebooting works fine, but > > selecting a boot environment from the boot menu fails. So it's probably > > a problem with the loader. I'll comment on the bug report myself > > shortly. > > Thank you for your comment on the bug report. > > What makes me suspicious is the fact that the menu shows > zfs:zroot/ROOT/test1 as the Active BE but the bootfs is still > zfs:zroot/ROOT/default: > > s` `.....---.......--.``` -/ > +============Welcome to FreeBSD===========+ +o .--` /y:` +. > | | yo`:. :o `+- > | 1. Active: zfs:zroot/ROOT/test1 | y/ -/` -o/ > | 2. bootfs: zfs:zroot/ROOT/default | .- ::/sy+:. > | 3. [P]age: 1 of 1 | / `-- / > | | `: :` > | Boot Environments: | `: :` > | 4. test1 | / / > | 5. default | .- -. > | | -- -. > | | `:` `:` > | | .-- `--. > | | .---.....----. > +=========================================+ > > Is it supposed to be so? > > -- > Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN > sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >